Why did wtpa move

You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page. By Rosemarie Lally January 20, Reuse Permissions.

Page Content. Rosemarie Lally, J. You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark. OK My Bookmarks. Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.

Delete Cancel. You have successfully removed bookmark. Delete canceled. Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks. Employers may wish to indicate on their notice form that, as far as the initial rate of pay is concerned, the employment agreement may be both written and oral by checking both boxes , and that, to the extent the communication regarding the employee's original rate of pay may be deemed to be an agreement to pay the employee that rate, the employer reserves the right, at its discretion, to modify that rate.

The answer to FAQ 21 also contains the DLSE's comment that the requested employment agreement information "has nothing to do with 'at will' employment. FAQ 22 and its answer note that changes to information about an employer's workers' compensation carrier are required by Labor Code sections and to be posted and to be given to new employees. Accordingly, if these statutes are complied with within seven days of any change to that information, no separate wage notice is required, per section FAQ 24 and its answer clarify that the "regular pay day" information need not be given by reference to specific pay dates, but should be expressed as "regular day s of the month when wages will be paid.

Examples include: 1st and 15th of every month; 1st and 2nd Friday of every month, each Friday of every month. The FAQs, first provided less than two business days before the January 1, effective date of the new statute, have been a source of continuing aggravation to affected California employers because of their late promulgation, and their uncertain status as enforceable administrative directions.

The FAQs are not regulations adopted after the comprehensive review and comment process for rulemaking required by the California Administrative Procedure Act Cal. Hence, one view of the consequences of a failure to comply with the FAQs including following what they term as the "best practice of providing notice to all current employees" is that it only constitutes a violation of advice from the agency responsible for administering the new law, not a violation of a validly adopted regulation, or of a statute.

When in doubt as to the interpretation or enforceability of the WTPA, or if an employee challenges the enterprise's compliance with the Act, consult with experienced employment law counsel. The text of Labor Code section If you would like further information, please contact your Littler attorney at 1. Littler or info littler. Cobey at ccobey littler. Macias at jmacias littler. Information contained in this publication is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or opinion, nor is it a substitute for the professional judgment of an attorney.

Subscribe RSS Updates. Skip to main content. Littler Mendelson P. Insight In-Depth Discussion. Download PDF. The key additions, changes, and advice contained in the January 23 modifications to the WTPA's wage notice provision's FAQs are: The DLSE considers it to be a "best practice" for employers to provide the wage notice to all current employees, though the statute only requires the notice be provided to new hires and to employees whose wage-related information has changed.

FAQ 2. The criminal wage theft provisions would be investigated by law enforcement agencies with criminal law enforcement authority and prosecuted by city attorneys, county attorneys and the state attorney general's office when requested by a county attorney. Employers are required to provide the written notice to all employees at the start of employment, which includes seasonal employees. If a seasonal employee's employment ends and the employee is hired again at the beginning of the next season, the employee must receive the written notice at the start of employment for the next season.

The employer must provide an employee in writing the change in the employee's rate of pay each time the employee's rate of pay changes, in English and the language requested by the employee, if any. The law states the employee needs to receive in writing a notice of the change prior to the change taking effect.

There is no requirement that the employee sign the written change notice. See also the answers to questions 5 and Employers may keep records electronically as long as they are readily available for inspection by DLI upon demand and DLI is able to secure copies of the records.

If an employee requests the written notice in a language other than English, the employer must provide the written notice, including all required information, to the employee in that language. The written notice example prepared by DLI has been translated into the 13 most commonly spoken languages in Minnesota and is available on the DLI webpage for use by employers.

DLI will work to assist employers whose employees request the written notice be provided in a language other than the 13 languages already translated by DLI. The law does not establish a time by which the written notice must be provided to an employee in the language requested by the employee.

However, providing the written notice in the requested language should be accomplished as close as possible to the start of employment. Yes, the initial written notice does not need to be provided by the employer in a specific format or on a specific form. In fact, the reference to and provision of an applicable collective bargaining agreement, policy or handbook may be used to satisfy the information required in the employee notice or change notice if the contract, policy or handbook being provided includes enough specifics for the employee to determine the information required to be in the notice as applied to them.

See also the answer to question 4. The "start" of employment is when the employee begins performing work for the employer. The written notice provision of the law does not use the term "hire. All employers are subject to the law's requirement. Employers will be held responsible for compliance with the law's requirements for each of their employees.

The resources provided on the DLI website, including these questions and answers, are intended to provide needed guidance to employers to allow them to assess their existing practices and bring them into compliance with the Wage Theft Prevention Act requirements. If an employer is seeking a legal review of its existing practices and legal advice about whether they meet the requirements of the law, the employer may wish to consult with a private attorney experienced in labor and employment law in Minnesota.

This will depend on the facts of the situation and the consequences for employees who were not provided the written notice before the changes went into effect. Employers who violate the employee notice and recordkeeping requirements may be issued a Commissioner Order to Comply that imposes remedies provided for in Minn.

Employees may also bring a private civil action seeking similar remedies and penalties. The written notice should identify all of the deductions that may be made by the employer from an employee's pay.

The amount of each deduction does not need to be indicated in the written notice. A list of deductions, including the amount of the deduction, is required in the statement of earnings that must be provided to the employee by the employer at the end of each pay period. All employers are subject to the law's written employee notice requirements and employers, including joint employers, will be held responsible for compliance with the law's requirements for each of their employees, including those employed jointly.

The Wage Theft Prevention Act requires specific information about an employee's employer be provided on the written notice and the earnings statement. If two employers jointly employ an employee, each employer is responsible for providing a written notice to the employee that meets the requirements of the law.

The law does not preclude joint employers from meeting this requirement by providing the employee with a joint written notice that provides the required information, including the required information about both employers. Application of the law would depend on the application of multiple factors and would be highly fact-dependent. Under Minn. In addition, the recordkeeping requirement in Minn. The employer must maintain a list of all personnel policies provided by the employer to the employee, with the date the policy was provided and a brief description of the policy.

A list of reputable translation services for other language translation requests is on the English version of the example employee notice posted on the DLI website.

This will depend on the facts of the situation and the consequences for employees. Pursuant to Minn. The order may impose the appropriate remedies and penalties included in Minn. In addition, the commissioner may issue civil penalties to an employer pursuant to Minn. Lastly, the employer may be charged with a misdemeanor under Minn.

The Wage Theft Prevention Act requires that the employee sign the written notice acknowledging receipt. The Wage Theft Prevention Act does not require the employer to sign the written notice. A discretionary bonus, for example, an end of the year bonus, would not likely constitute a rate of pay as contemplated by the new notice requirement and is, therefore, not required in the initial written notice and will not require a written change notification.

A nondiscretionary bonus, for example, additional wages earned after a certain goal is reached, is required to be identified as a rate of pay in the initial written notice and requires a written change notification if changed. The definition of employee in Minn. MFLSA definitions are limited in scope. See Minn.

The new notice requirements, changes to the required statement of earnings and changes to payment of wages are in Minn. Whether a specific worker is an employee under Minn. The requirement that an earning statement include "the total number of hours worked by the employee unless exempt from chapter " was not affected by the Wage Theft Prevention Act.

Minnesota Statutes section Employees must be provided with a written notice of any changes to the information in the initial written notice, including rates of pay. If the rates of the prevailing-wage project were not included in the initial written notice or a change notice, then the new applicable rates for the prevailing-wage job need to be provided to the employees via a written change notification.

The written change notice can be provided in hard copy or electronically. Simply referring employees to a jobsite posting is not sufficient to meet the initial notice or the change notice requirements.

If the employer wants to use a jobsite posting to meet its notice obligations, the jobsite posting, including the prevailing-wage rates that apply to the employee, must be attached to the initial written notice or written change notice. The initial written notice or change notice and the attachments must contain enough specifics for the employee to identify the applicable rate or rates of pay for their job classification s.

The law does not define when commissions are earned. This is typically defined in an agreement between the employer and employee. After commissions are earned, they must be paid within three months. The employer is obligated to translate the portions of the CBA or policy specifically referenced in the notice requirement that are necessary to.

High pressure piping contractors Independent contractor registration License forms, permits, plan review and local governments Manufactured structures Plumbing and mechanical contractors Residential contractors, remodelers, roofers Safety and health at work Workers' compensation -- Businesses. Does an employer need to state on an earnings statement whether an employee is "exempt" or "non-exempt"?